Indonesia
Author Guidelines
Authors are invited to submit original and high-quality scholarly manuscripts to Journal of Pollution Mitigation and Sustainable Technology. Manuscripts should demonstrate a clear contribution to pollution prevention, environmental remediation, waste reduction, resource recovery, environmental monitoring, circular technology, or sustainable environmental systems.
- General Requirements
- Article Types
- Submission Files and Anonymity
- Manuscript Structure
- Title and Author Information
- Abstract and Keywords
- Introduction
- Literature and Technical Background
- Methods
- Results and Discussion
- Conclusion and Sustainability Implications
- Ethical and Transparency Statements
- Environmental Data, Models and AI Use
- Tables, Figures and Technical Materials
- References
- Submission Preparation Checklist
- Review, Revision and After Acceptance
1. General Requirements
Manuscripts must present original scholarly work that has not been published previously and is not simultaneously under consideration by another journal.
Submissions should demonstrate a substantive contribution to one or more of the journal's principal areas: Pollution Prevention and Mitigation Technologies, Environmental Treatment and Remediation, Waste Management, Resource Recovery and Circular Technology, or Environmental Monitoring, Digital Technologies and Sustainable Systems.
Manuscripts focused primarily on generic environmental assessment, artificial intelligence, materials characterization, energy systems, or sustainability indicators should clearly demonstrate their relevance to pollution mitigation, environmental treatment, resource recovery, remediation, or sustainable environmental technology.
2. Article Types
- Original Research Articles — experimental, field, computational, engineering, environmental, or sustainability studies.
- Review Articles — critical reviews of pollution control, remediation, waste management, circular technology, or sustainable systems.
- Systematic Reviews and Evidence Syntheses — structured reviews using transparent search, selection, and analytical procedures.
- Technical and Engineering Studies — treatment systems, monitoring technologies, resource recovery, mitigation technologies, and sustainable process design.
- Applied Environmental and Sustainability Studies — industrial, urban, coastal, marine, agricultural, infrastructure, and community-scale environmental applications.
3. Submission Files and Anonymity
The journal applies a double-anonymous peer review process. Manuscripts submitted for review must not contain author names, affiliations, acknowledgements, or other information that directly identifies the authors.
Full author names, affiliations, countries, email addresses, and ORCID identifiers should be entered separately in the OJS metadata.
Manuscripts should be submitted in an editable word-processing format and should follow the official journal template where available.
4. Manuscript Structure
- Title
- Abstract
- Keywords
- Introduction
- Literature Review and/or Technical Background
- Materials and Methods / Methodology
- Results and Discussion
- Conclusion and Sustainability Implications
- Acknowledgements, where applicable
- Funding Statement, where applicable
- Conflict of Interest Statement
- Ethics Approval and Informed Consent, where applicable
- Data Availability Statement, where applicable
- AI Use Disclosure, where applicable
- References
5. Title and Author Information
The title should be concise, specific, technically informative, and accurately reflect the pollution, treatment, remediation, waste-management, monitoring, or sustainability issue investigated.
Complete author metadata must be entered through OJS, including full name, institutional affiliation, country, email address, and ORCID identifier where available.
6. Abstract and Keywords
The abstract should normally contain approximately 150–250 words and summarize the research problem, objective, methods, principal findings, and major environmental, technological, or sustainability implications.
Authors should provide 3–6 keywords that accurately represent the principal pollution, remediation, treatment, waste-management, monitoring, circular-economy, or sustainability concepts of the study.
7. Introduction
The Introduction should establish the environmental, scientific, technological, industrial, or societal context of the study; define the pollution or sustainability problem; identify the research or technology gap; state the objectives or research questions; and clearly explain the novelty and significance of the work.
8. Literature and Technical Background
Authors should critically engage with relevant national and international scientific literature rather than merely listing previous studies.
Where relevant, the manuscript should explain pollution pathways, contaminant behavior, treatment mechanisms, remediation principles, resource-recovery technologies, monitoring approaches, circular-economy concepts, or sustainability frameworks used in the research.
The technical background should clearly establish how the study advances existing knowledge, environmental performance, or sustainable technology.
9. Materials and Methods / Methodology
The methodology should provide sufficient detail to allow readers to understand, evaluate, and where appropriate reproduce the research.
10. Results and Discussion
Results should be presented clearly and should correspond directly to the research objectives or hypotheses.
Quantitative studies should report appropriate values, units, statistical measures, uncertainty, repeatability, or confidence information where relevant.
Treatment efficiencies, pollution-reduction rates, environmental concentrations, resource-recovery performance, lifecycle impacts, or sustainability indicators should be presented transparently and compared with appropriate benchmarks or previous studies.
The Discussion should interpret the findings in relation to pollution mechanisms, treatment performance, environmental significance, resource efficiency, technology feasibility, sustainability, and relevant published literature.
11. Conclusion and Sustainability Implications
The Conclusion should directly reflect the principal findings and clearly state their environmental, technological, operational, economic, or sustainability significance.
Recommendations for researchers, technology developers, industries, environmental managers, communities, regulators, or policymakers should be supported by the evidence presented.
Study limitations, uncertainty, applicability boundaries, and directions for future research should be stated where appropriate.
12. Ethical and Transparency Statements
Authors should provide the following information where applicable:
- Ethics approval;
- Informed consent;
- Environmental or field-study permissions;
- Industrial or institutional permissions;
- Funding information;
- Conflict of interest declaration;
- Data availability statement;
- Acknowledgements;
- AI use disclosure.
Authors remain fully responsible for the accuracy, authenticity, originality, methodological validity, ethical compliance, and interpretation of all submitted research materials.
13. Environmental Data, Models and AI Use
Research involving environmental monitoring data, industrial records, satellite datasets, sensor information, proprietary technologies, field measurements, or restricted environmental data should comply with applicable confidentiality, ethical, legal, and institutional requirements.
Artificial intelligence systems and generative AI tools cannot be listed as authors. Substantive use of AI in writing, coding, environmental prediction, pollution classification, remote sensing, optimization, digital twins, image analysis, or literature synthesis should be disclosed where relevant.
14. Tables, Figures and Technical Materials
Tables, figures, diagrams, treatment schematics, environmental maps, satellite images, pollutant-distribution plots, process-flow diagrams, numerical outputs, lifecycle charts, and other technical materials should be clearly numbered, titled, and cited in the manuscript text.
Units, symbols, legends, sampling locations, scales, axes, classifications, and relevant environmental parameters should be clearly defined.
Authors are responsible for ensuring that figures, maps, images, industrial photographs, and reproduced materials comply with copyright, confidentiality, and permission requirements.
15. References
References should be relevant, scientifically credible, and sufficient to establish the current state of knowledge.
Authors are encouraged to engage with recent peer-reviewed international literature together with appropriate foundational research.
Relevant standards, environmental regulations, technical reports, international guidelines, and policy documents may be cited where appropriate.
Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) should be provided whenever available. References suggested or generated by AI systems must be independently verified.
Citation manipulation, fabricated references, unnecessary self-citation, and irrelevant citation practices are not acceptable. Reference formatting should follow the official journal template.
16. Submission Preparation Checklist
- The manuscript fits the Aim and Scopes of the journal.
- The manuscript is original and not under consideration elsewhere.
- The manuscript is written in clear academic English.
- The review manuscript has been anonymized.
- Complete author metadata has been entered in OJS.
- The research problem, gap, and contribution are clearly stated.
- Sampling methods are adequately described where applicable.
- Environmental test conditions are clearly reported.
- Treatment and remediation parameters are transparent.
- Removal-efficiency calculations are clearly defined.
- Analytical procedures and quality-control methods are reported.
- Numerical assumptions and validation procedures are stated where applicable.
- Remote-sensing and monitoring data sources are clearly identified where relevant.
- LCA system boundaries and assumptions are stated where applicable.
- Uncertainty and study limitations are reported.
- Industrial or proprietary data permissions are addressed where relevant.
- Ethics approval and permissions are reported where applicable.
- Funding and conflicts of interest are disclosed.
- Data availability is stated where applicable.
- Substantive AI use is disclosed where applicable.
- Tables and figures accurately represent the research.
- References are accurate and include DOI information where available.
- The manuscript follows the official journal template.
17. Review, Revision and After Acceptance
Manuscripts first undergo editorial screening for scope, originality, scholarly contribution, technical validity, methodological quality, ethical compliance, and adherence to submission requirements.
Manuscripts that pass screening may proceed to double-anonymous peer review by at least two independent reviewers .
Authors receiving a revision decision should respond point-by-point to reviewer and editor comments and clearly identify changes made in the revised manuscript.
Submission of a revised manuscript does not guarantee acceptance. Final publication decisions remain the responsibility of the editorial team.
Following acceptance, manuscripts may undergo copyediting, technical and metadata verification, reference checking, layout preparation, proofreading, and other production procedures before publication.